<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CounterPunch verifies infant mortality was alarmism but seems keen to create more of it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Research Regarding Infant Deaths Linked To Japan&#8217;s Fukushima Meets Controversy - Better Health</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-59039</link>
		<dc:creator>Research Regarding Infant Deaths Linked To Japan&#8217;s Fukushima Meets Controversy - Better Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-59039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] research, which was harshly criticized by Scientific American’s Michael Moyer and others, was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of International Health Services, and I had asked the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] research, which was harshly criticized by Scientific American’s Michael Moyer and others, was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of International Health Services, and I had asked the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fukushima Fallout and Infant Deaths: A Response from International Journal of Health Services&#039; Vicente Navarro &#124; Reporting on Health</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-58856</link>
		<dc:creator>Fukushima Fallout and Infant Deaths: A Response from International Journal of Health Services&#039; Vicente Navarro &#124; Reporting on Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-58856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] States. The research, which was harshly criticized by Scientific American’s Michael Moyer and others, was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of International Health Services, and I had asked the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] States. The research, which was harshly criticized by Scientific American’s Michael Moyer and others, was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of International Health Services, and I had asked the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to cherry-pick your statistics &#171; Conspiracy Nutbars of New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-58826</link>
		<dc:creator>How to cherry-pick your statistics &#171; Conspiracy Nutbars of New Zealand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-58826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Well, they fudged the numbers is what they did, as explained here (and here, here, here, here, to name but a few of the sites that have taken the time to look at the actual [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, they fudged the numbers is what they did, as explained here (and here, here, here, here, to name but a few of the sites that have taken the time to look at the actual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fukushima: Alarmist Claim? Obscure Medical Journal? Proceed With Caution &#124; Reporting on Health</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-58819</link>
		<dc:creator>Fukushima: Alarmist Claim? Obscure Medical Journal? Proceed With Caution &#124; Reporting on Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-58819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Counterpunch, where it was quickly criticized. The critics charged that the authors&#160;&#160; had cherry-picked federal data on infant deaths so they would spike around the time of the Fukushima disaster. Passions over nuclear safety further [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Counterpunch, where it was quickly criticized. The critics charged that the authors&nbsp;&nbsp; had cherry-picked federal data on infant deaths so they would spike around the time of the Fukushima disaster. Passions over nuclear safety further [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Karnerfors</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karnerfors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Jens: Spam-markerad... du fattar varför. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jens: Spam-markerad... du fattar varför. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tjena Mattias,

Hörde att du gillar att suga slak! Du är en hjälte!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tjena Mattias,</p>
<p>Hörde att du gillar att suga slak! Du är en hjälte!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantzelot</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54908</link>
		<dc:creator>Lantzelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test 1

Test 2
&lt;strong&gt;Test 3&lt;/strong&gt; test 3.5

Test 4

Test 5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test 1</p>
<p>Test 2<br />
<strong>Test 3</strong> test 3.5</p>
<p>Test 4</p>
<p>Test 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmoskitten</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54890</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmoskitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep up the good work, Lantzelot / Mattias Lantz!

When reading this, somehow, I come to think about wiping up other peoples vomit. Or wiping up after people that are too drunk to actually shit _in_ the toilet.



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work, Lantzelot / Mattias Lantz!</p>
<p>When reading this, somehow, I come to think about wiping up other peoples vomit. Or wiping up after people that are too drunk to actually shit _in_ the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantzelot</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54820</link>
		<dc:creator>Lantzelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salve Antonio,
I am also happy to see that more people are looking into this by themselves, it is the only way to counter the nonsense. And, to tell you the truth, it is a relief that your conclusions are the same. Although several double checks there could have been some mistake by me. Now it is up to Cockburn and Sprey to explain themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salve Antonio,<br />
I am also happy to see that more people are looking into this by themselves, it is the only way to counter the nonsense. And, to tell you the truth, it is a relief that your conclusions are the same. Although several double checks there could have been some mistake by me. Now it is up to Cockburn and Sprey to explain themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Rinaldi</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/06/21/counterpunch-verifies-infant-mortality-fraud-but-seems-to-create-one-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-54817</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Rinaldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=2873#comment-54817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mattias, I&#039;m glad to read your comment. It seems that we have indipentently 
found a serious error (both arithmetical and logical) in the 
CounterPunch reply. Isn’t it?
http://www.antoniorinaldi.it/e-nucleare-disinformazione]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mattias, I'm glad to read your comment. It seems that we have indipentently<br />
found a serious error (both arithmetical and logical) in the<br />
CounterPunch reply. Isn’t it?<br />
<a href="http://www.antoniorinaldi.it/e-nucleare-disinformazione" rel="nofollow">http://www.antoniorinaldi.it/e-nucleare-disinformazione</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
