<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherman &amp; Mangano admits errors - or do they?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/07/27/sherman-mangano-admits-errors-or-do-they/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/07/27/sherman-mangano-admits-errors-or-do-they/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantzelot</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/07/27/sherman-mangano-admits-errors-or-do-they/comment-page-1/#comment-55410</link>
		<dc:creator>Lantzelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=3135#comment-55410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kitty, and thanks for your megalomaniacal opinion. Here is a late response to your suggestions.

&lt;i&gt;1) Ask some rude friends to find fault in your posts and reasoning.&lt;/i&gt;
Done. For several of the blog entries I asked other members of NPYP to double check the numbers and also to find any logical faults in my reasoning.

&lt;i&gt;Get a professional from a analytically literate field (not nuclear though) to criticise your post&lt;/i&gt;
Hm, if S&amp;M were doing science it would be worthwile. In the present case they did not even try to publish it as a scientific article, and they would hopefully not get far if they had tried.

&lt;i&gt;If needed, post a new post with corrections in your reasoning&lt;/i&gt;
Done, I have updated some entries due to some criticism.

&lt;i&gt;4) Get a professional &quot;ally&quot; to support you. 2 people is psychologically speaking, much more than 1 person.&lt;/i&gt;
Not quite sure what you mean. If I need moral support then I will ask for it. In any case, I have had good support in the commentary fields from other people, not the least from several NPYP members.

&lt;i&gt;5) Get CounterPunch to post a reply. From what I have read, they for sure need to. You might be reasoning faulty, but i haven´t found out where.&lt;/i&gt;
I have emailed Alexander Cockburn twice, asking for an explanation regarding the Pierre Sprey study, but not a single bleep from him. Instead they have put Sprey to extend his already faulty study to more cities in the US. In this case they do not want anybody to question it without paying for it, so I will leave it at that. You can find their teaser here, below &quot;Our latest newsletter&quot;: http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/12/riots-and-the-underclass

&lt;i&gt;6) Keep speaking truth to power.&lt;/i&gt;
Could be a controversial phrase to use considering where Counterpunch places themselves on the political scale. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kitty, and thanks for your megalomaniacal opinion. Here is a late response to your suggestions.</p>
<p><i>1) Ask some rude friends to find fault in your posts and reasoning.</i><br />
Done. For several of the blog entries I asked other members of NPYP to double check the numbers and also to find any logical faults in my reasoning.</p>
<p><i>Get a professional from a analytically literate field (not nuclear though) to criticise your post</i><br />
Hm, if S&amp;M were doing science it would be worthwile. In the present case they did not even try to publish it as a scientific article, and they would hopefully not get far if they had tried.</p>
<p><i>If needed, post a new post with corrections in your reasoning</i><br />
Done, I have updated some entries due to some criticism.</p>
<p><i>4) Get a professional "ally" to support you. 2 people is psychologically speaking, much more than 1 person.</i><br />
Not quite sure what you mean. If I need moral support then I will ask for it. In any case, I have had good support in the commentary fields from other people, not the least from several NPYP members.</p>
<p><i>5) Get CounterPunch to post a reply. From what I have read, they for sure need to. You might be reasoning faulty, but i haven´t found out where.</i><br />
I have emailed Alexander Cockburn twice, asking for an explanation regarding the Pierre Sprey study, but not a single bleep from him. Instead they have put Sprey to extend his already faulty study to more cities in the US. In this case they do not want anybody to question it without paying for it, so I will leave it at that. You can find their teaser here, below "Our latest newsletter": http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/12/riots-and-the-underclass</p>
<p><i>6) Keep speaking truth to power.</i><br />
Could be a controversial phrase to use considering where Counterpunch places themselves on the political scale. <img src='http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmoskitten</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/07/27/sherman-mangano-admits-errors-or-do-they/comment-page-1/#comment-55114</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmoskitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=3135#comment-55114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good work!

In my megalomaniacal opinion, you should do the following:

1) Ask some rude friends to find fault in your posts and reasoning.

2) Get a professional from a analytically literate field (not nuclear though) to criticise your post

3) If needed, post a new post with corrections in your reasoning

4) Get a professional &quot;ally&quot; to support you. 2 people is psychologically speaking, much more than 1 person.

5) Get CounterPunch to post a reply. From what I have read, they for sure need to. You might be reasoning faulty, but i haven´t found out where.

6) Keep speaking truth to power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work!</p>
<p>In my megalomaniacal opinion, you should do the following:</p>
<p>1) Ask some rude friends to find fault in your posts and reasoning.</p>
<p>2) Get a professional from a analytically literate field (not nuclear though) to criticise your post</p>
<p>3) If needed, post a new post with corrections in your reasoning</p>
<p>4) Get a professional "ally" to support you. 2 people is psychologically speaking, much more than 1 person.</p>
<p>5) Get CounterPunch to post a reply. From what I have read, they for sure need to. You might be reasoning faulty, but i haven´t found out where.</p>
<p>6) Keep speaking truth to power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/2011/07/27/sherman-mangano-admits-errors-or-do-they/comment-page-1/#comment-55064</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclearpoweryesplease.org/blog/?p=3135#comment-55064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check mate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check mate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
