Firstly, how is heating normally done in Sweden? Given the Swedish climate, the electricity consumption required for resistive heating would be colossal, so are heat pumps currently used?
I frequently read Atomic Insights, and had already seen the Australian advert attacking nuclear power which you attached. However, what I am suggesting is that since (except in poor, benighted Germany and Austria) there are no longer powerful
anti-nuclear activist groups, the regulations that cripple nuclear technology were quite likely to have been introduced for corrupt reasons. As for Germany, I designed this anti-Gerhard Schroeder poster myself, when I heard about what he had done after leaving office (the left-hand mugshot by the way is Erich Honecker, the former puppet ruler of Communist East Germany):

I understand that Sweden had a referendum in 1980 (the year I was born, incidentally!), which asked the public not
if nuclear power should be phased out, but
when. Surely if the anti-nukes believed that they had public opinion on their side, they would have offered a
real referendum, instead of this phony referendum. Is there any evidence that vested interests of any kind were involved in that stitch-up?